Evaluating Pregnancy in Mind
Previous outcomes evaluations of Pregnancy in Mind (PiM) found there were significant improvements in a range of outcomes for parents who attended.
A 2020 process evaluation found statistically significant improvements were recorded in parents’ anxiety, depression, parent-foetal attachment and relationship quality scores on standardised measures after they attended (Thomas et al, 2020).
> Read the Pregnancy in Mind 2020 process evaluation
When a virtual model of the programme was adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, a follow-up evaluation found that there were still statistically significant improvements in outcomes measured before and after the intervention, with reductions in parents’ anxiety and depression scores (McElearny et al, 2021).
> Read the Pregnancy in Mind 2021 COVID-19 report
Both studies, however, were limited in that they did not have a comparison group which means we cannot be confident that the changes observed were down to the intervention.
Current study
We want to build on this evidence by having a more robust impact evaluation which includes a comparison group.
First we will conduct a feasibility study to explore the acceptability and practicality of different impact evaluation designs. We will test out measures with non-NSPCC delivery sites, considering issues such as numbers of evaluation measure returns and attrition levels.
If this evaluation finds that an impact evaluation will be viable then we would look to follow this up with a larger scale study.
As part of this evaluation we want to learn if PiM improves:
- levels of depression and anxiety
- quality of relationship between partners
- expectant parents’ relationship with their unborn baby.
We will use qualitative and quantitative methods in our feasibility and impact studies if they progress to that stage.
> Find out more about NSPCC Research