Criteria for carrying out a child safeguarding practice review
In England, child safeguarding practice reviews (previously known as serious case reviews) should be considered for serious child safeguarding cases where:
- abuse or neglect of a child is known or suspected
- and a child has died or been seriously harmed.
This may include cases where a child has caused serious harm to someone else.
Serious harm includes, but is not limited to serious and/or long-term impairment of a child’s mental or physical health or intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural development.
This should include cases where impairment is likely to be long-term, even if this is not immediately certain.
- There are 2 types of reviews:
Local reviews – where safeguarding partners consider that a case raise issues of importance in relation to their area.
- National reviews – where the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel considers that a case raises issues which are complex or of national importance. The Panel may also commission reviews on any incident(s) or theme they think relevant.
In England, the key guidance for safeguarding practice reviews is Working together to safeguard children: a guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children (Department for Education, 2018a).
The responsibility for learning lessons from serious child safeguarding incidents lies with the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel at a national level and safeguarding partners at a local level (local authorities, chief officers of police, and clinical commissioning groups).
Local authorities must:
- notify the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel and the safeguarding partners in their area (and in other areas if appropriate) within five working days if they know or suspect that a child has been seriously harmed or died as a result of abuse or neglect
- notify the Secretary of State and Ofsted where a looked after child has died, whether or not abuse or neglect is known or suspected.
At a local level, the safeguarding partners must make arrangements to:
- identify and consider serious child safeguarding cases which raise issues of importance in relation to their area
- commission and oversee child safeguarding practice reviews of those cases, where they consider it to be appropriate.
The safeguarding partners should:
- undertake a rapid review of the case to identify any immediate action to ensure a child's safety, consider the potential for identifying learning and help inform a decision about whether to undertake a child safeguarding practice review.
- send a copy of the rapid review to the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel along with their decision about whether to carry out a local child safeguarding practice review and whether they think a national review may be more appropriate.
Meeting the criteria does not mean that safeguarding partners must automatically carry out a local child safeguarding practice review. Decisions on whether to undertake reviews should be made transparently and the rationale communicated appropriately, including to families.
Safeguarding partners are responsible for:
- commissioning and supervising reviewers for local reviews and agreeing the methodology to be used
- ensuring that practitioners, families and surviving children are fully involved in reviews and invited to contribute their perspectives without fear of being blamed for actions they took in good faith.
At a national level, the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel is responsible for:
- identifying serious child safeguarding cases which raise issues that are complex or of national importance
- overseeing the review of these cases
- setting up a pool of potential reviewers who can undertake national reviews, a list of whom must be publicly available
- agreeing the potential scope and methodology of the review with the local safeguarding partners and engaging with them and others involved in the case.
All child safeguarding practice reviews should:
- reflect the child's perspective and the family context
- be proportionate to the circumstances of the case
- focus on potential learning
- establish and explain the reasons why the events occurred as they did.
The final report should include:
- a summary of recommended improvements to safeguard and promote the welfare of children
- an analysis of any systemic or underlying reasons why actions were taken or not taken.
Reports should be published no later than six months after the date of the decision to carry out a review.
Safeguarding partners must publish local reviews and the Panel must publish national reviews, unless they consider it inappropriate to do so. In such a circumstance, they must publish any information about the improvements that should be made following the review that they consider it appropriate to publish. The safeguarding partners should ensure that reports are written in such a way so that what is published avoids harming the welfare of any children or vulnerable adults involved in the case. Safeguarding partners should set out the justification for any decision not to publish either the full report or information relating to improvements.
- Local child safeguarding practice review reports must be publicly available for at least one year.
- The reports of national reviews must be made publicly available for at least three years.
Learning from case reviews
Safeguarding partners must send the reports or learning from them to the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel and to the Secretary of State prior to publication. They should also send the report or learning to Ofsted. The Panel should send copies of published reports of national and local child safeguarding practice reviews, or published information relating to improvements that should be made following those reviews, to the What Works Centre for Children's Social Care and other relevant inspectorates, bodies or individuals as they see fit.
The safeguarding partners should highlight findings from reviews with relevant parties locally and should regularly audit progress on the implementation of recommended improvements. Improvement should be sustained through regular monitoring and follow up of actions so that the findings from these reviews make a real impact on improving outcomes for children.
The Department for Education (DfE) has published a series of reports analysing the learning from serious case reviews that were published between 2003-2014. The most recent of these is Pathways to harm, pathways to protection: a triennial analysis of serious case reviews 2011 to 2014 (Department for Education, 2016).
Our National case review repository holds copies of published reports, making it easier to access and share learning.
> Find out more about the National case review repository
On 29 June 2018, local areas began their transition from Local Children's Safeguarding Boards (LSCBs) to the local safeguarding partner arrangements set out in Working together to safeguard children 2018 (Department for Education, 2018a). This guidance also sets out the new process for child safeguarding practice reviews, replacing the previous process for conducting serious case reviews.
LSCBs have been given a statutory grace period of up to 12 months to complete and publish the reports of serious case reviews that were commissioned before 29 June 2018. This transition must be completed by 29 September 2019. Statutory guidance has been published for the transition period: Working Together: transitional guidance Statutory guidance for Local Safeguarding Children Boards, local authorities, safeguarding partners, child death review partners, and the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel (Department for Education, 2018b).